Wednesday, April 6, 2011
Wednesday, March 9, 2011
Turow & Authors Guild Not Just Out of Touch on the Subject of eBook Pricing, but also ...
Friday, March 4, 2011
Scorned librarians and the eBook piracy underground
Tuesday, March 1, 2011
Do E-Book Users Need a Bill of Rights? (Librarians Think So)
Friday, February 11, 2011
PC WORLD Ponders the eBook Format Morass
Wednesday, February 2, 2011
EXCELLENT Interview with O'Reilly eBook Guru Andrew Savikas
Saturday, January 15, 2011
Magellan Media's Brian O'Leary: Data Needs to Drive eBook Piracy Debate
Thursday, December 9, 2010
Don't Believe the Rhetoric Behind Google's New "Open" eBook Store
Tuesday, December 7, 2010
Adobe's eBook DRM Adopted By Google
Friday, December 3, 2010
DRM ala Google
Tuesday, November 30, 2010
At Last, a Common Sense, Non-Paranoid Consideration of eBook Piracy, and Its Future
... One of the reasons the MP3 piracy scene was possible was that, along with the capability to shrink music to a 4MB file, it was built around a standard file format, MP3, which was supported by every media player. DivX brought the same standardization to movie piracy. In both cases, an entire ecosystem arose, based around the common file format.
EPUB is supposed to be the e-book standard file format, but by refusing to adopt it for the Kindle, Amazon is taking one step towards stopping a piracy ecosystem developing for e-books. Conversion to a compatible format is, of course, entirely possible, but Amazon may be hoping that the difficulty and hassle of doing so will put many off.
The other strategic difference when e-book readers are compared to media players is that e-book readers usually have built-in bookstore browsers. This was the failing that initially allowed MP3 piracy to gain a hold. In the late 90s, people had MP3 players and software but no legitimate source of MP3s, other than ripping them from CDs. It took Apple and the development of iTunes to bring some order to the chaos, to the extent that now most people are happy paying for music, and piracy is limited to a hard core of people who never had any intention of paying anyway.
While there are still many questions over e-book pricing, statistics released from the likes of Amazon indicate that people are happy making use of e-book stores straight from their devices. While piracy will always be an issue for any organization offering creative content online, all the signs are that those behind e-book readers have thought things through so that they're able to avoid e-book piracy being a necessity, and also less of a temptation. ...
Friday, October 29, 2010
Institutional Libraries Say 'No DRM' - Springer Agrees - Bravo
Saturday, October 23, 2010
Kindle eBook Lending, etc.
Saturday, October 16, 2010
ePagine Adobe DRM eBook Reader Released for iPad
Wednesday, October 6, 2010
Study: Arghhhh Matey - E-Book Piracy on the Rise
Thursday, August 5, 2010
B&N Nook for Android Now Supports EPUB Side Load and SD App Storage
Monday, August 2, 2010
Cory Doctorow on DRM, Lockdowns and Authors' Rights
Friday, June 18, 2010
Authors Guild, Turow, Piracy Redux
I do believe that there are markets in which digital book piracy is a net loss - college textbooks may provide the most direct example. But I also believe that there may be markets, and authors, for whom piracy helps improve awareness, trial and paid sales.
That’s why we started studying the impact of piracy on paid sales almost two years ago. On an admittedly limited sample (something we’d like your help to grow), we’ve found an apparent correlation between piracy and subsequent growth in paid sales.
Now, you recently told GalleyCat’s Jason Boog that “…the larger problem for us is the pirating of books”. I ask, simply, “How do you know?”
There are no reliable studies of the impact of piracy in the book business. Because our sample set is limited, I include our own work to date in that bucket. The studies that are cited most often are based on sampling techniques that try to track the instance of piracy, then apply an assumed number for “substitution rates” (lost sales).
The Government Accounting Office recently “assessed the assessments” of digital piracy and found them all lacking. That’s not the final word, but it’s an indication that conclusions drawn on the limited data available are premature, at least. ...
The Grateful Dead, The Economy of Ideas, And Reconsidering the Notion of eBook Piracy
Two points.
1) I wonder how he has quantified this. I mean, what's the methodology? Given the extent to which all the major players load their editions up with DRM, I'm skeptical of the risk.
2) More importantly, however, I wonder how much of a detriment piracy actually is. Are we even correct in viewing piracy as something we actually want to avoid? There's evidence that piracy (in my view: free word-of-mouth) grows reputations and thus fuels legitimate sales.
So, the question: Do we need DRM? The Grateful Dead used to create a dedicated space at their concerts for people who wanted to record bootlegs of the band playing live. They encouraged the exercise and, in effect, gave away their work (their "content") for free. In turn, the band's reputation/fanbase grew exponentially.
As regards books, per Michael Shatzkin, there's little evidence file-sharing reduces sales. Shatzkin points to science fiction writer Cory Doctorow who "does the best he can to give away as much of his content as possible." The result? Doctorow's sales continue to boom.
I am reminded of a statement in "The Economy of Ideas," that seminal 1994 essay by Grateful Dead lyricist, EFF co-founder, Berkman Center Fellow, and (now) New Street Communications Editorial Advisory Board member John Perry Barlow: "The increasing difficulty of enforcing existing copyright and patent laws is already placing in peril the ultimate source of intellectual property - the free exchange of ideas ... unbounded intellectual property is very different from physical property and can no longer be protected as though these differences did not exist. ... if we continue to assume that value is based on scarcity, as it is with regard to physical objects, we will create laws that are precisely contrary to the nature of information, which may, in many cases, increase in value with distribution."
Here is Barlow making the same point - click the center "play" button: